A whole-child check for ages 2 to 16 and up. Answer honestly about what you actually see, including the things going well. We'll show you which areas look fine and which might be worth a closer look.
What's typical changes enormously with age, so this shapes every question that follows.
These matter more than people expect. How long something has gone on, whether it happens in more than one place, and whether it's actually causing difficulty, are the things professionals weigh most heavily.
Send your answers to our education team on WhatsApp. We'll suggest a sensible next step, free and with no obligation, even if that step is somewhere other than here.
We only use your details to respond. We never sell or share them. (PDPA 2010)
This check is written by our education team in plain language. Prompts for younger children follow the publicly available CDC "Learn the Signs. Act Early." milestone approach; school-age prompts reflect widely published clinical concepts around persistence, setting and impact. It is not a validated screening instrument, reproduces none, and gives no score or diagnosis.
Most parents arrive here with one worry. Reading, or talking, or sitting still. The check deliberately asks about ten areas instead, because the area you are worried about is often not the area causing the trouble.
A child who will not sit still for homework may have an attention difficulty. Or they may be a strong reader who finds the work far too easy, or a weak reader who has learned that the desk is where they feel stupid. The behaviour looks identical from the kitchen table. What separates them is the pattern across everything else, which is why we ask about all ten.
Because almost nothing on this page means anything without it. A four year old who mixes up b and d is doing exactly what four year olds do. A nine year old doing the same thing is telling you something. Not reading at five is unremarkable in Malaysia, where children start formal reading at different points depending on the school system. Not reading at eight is worth attention.
The check uses five age bands, and the questions change completely between them. For children under six the prompts follow the milestone approach used in the CDC's publicly available "Learn the Signs. Act Early." materials, which ask what most children that age can do rather than what a struggling child cannot. From six upwards the questions shift to how often something happens, because by then the useful signal is frequency rather than presence.
At the end of the check we ask three things that feel almost too simple. They are there because they are close to what a professional weighs before considering any formal assessment.
All three need to be true before a pattern is worth taking further. One on its own rarely means much.
Before anyone reaches for a label, these are worth ruling out. Several are cheap or free to check and are missed surprisingly often.
The result is not a diagnosis and gives no score, deliberately. It sorts the ten areas into what looks fine and what might be worth a closer look, and that is as far as any parent questionnaire can honestly go. Only a qualified professional can diagnose, and they do it with direct assessment of your child, not a form.
If something comes back as worth a closer look, the sensible next step is usually not an expensive private assessment. It is a conversation with your child's teacher about whether they see the same thing, a hearing and vision check, and then a proper look at whether targeted help changes anything over a term. If it does, you may not need anything further. If it does not, that itself is useful evidence to bring to a paediatrician or psychologist.
We are happy to be the first of those conversations, and to say plainly if we think you need someone other than us.
No, and we are careful not to call it one. It is a structured way of organising what you already notice. Validated screening instruments are copyrighted, require training to administer and score, and are not reproduced here or anywhere on this site.
Not necessarily. Difficulties overlap a great deal. Roughly a third to a half of children with one learning difference have features of another, and a child who is struggling in one area often looks wobbly in others simply from lost confidence. Several flagged areas is a reason to look properly, not a reason to panic.
Trust the worry. Parents are usually right that something is different, even when they are wrong about what it is. A questionnaire only asks what it thinks to ask. If your instinct says otherwise, talk to someone.
No. Most of the children we work with come to us without one, and some never pursue one. Support is built around what a child actually finds hard, which does not require a label.